search

Elena Jamshidi vs Marilouise Van Zyl Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jamshidi vs Zyl analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Want To Bet On This Match?

After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:

* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here

If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com  Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.

Elena Jamshidi vs Marilouise Van Zyl Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Jamshidi 0 - 0 Zyl

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jamshidi has won 40.89% of points on their second serve, while Zyl has won 41.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jamshidi, in recent form, has won 57.44% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zyl has won 61.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.53% and 44.82% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Jamshidi has saved 37.8% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zyl has saved 51.89% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Jamshidi has won 39.47% of matches played (W/L 15/ 23), with Zyl winning 68.75% (W/L 11/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Jamshidi has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 6/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 21/ 38). Zyl has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 11/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 11/ 11).
  • Player level: In the last year, Jamshidi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40.74% of matches (W/L 11/ 16), where as Zyl has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 7/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jamshidi has played against opponents with an average rank of 186.21 while Zyl has played against players with an average rank of 59.06.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jamshidi has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zyl has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Jamshidi has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zyl has converted 51.89% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
Elena Jamshidi

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

N/A

Rank

High

23

Age

Plays

0

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

N/A

Rank

High

18

Age

Plays

Marilouise Van Zyl

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

0

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

L W W W W L W W L L

Form

W L W L W W L W W W

38% (63-101)

Career Total W/L

50% (11-11)

47% (9-10)

YTD W/L

69% (11-5)

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For Elena Jamshidi vs Marilouise Van Zyl For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Jamshidi VS Zyl

Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!

Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting

Jamshidi VS Zyl H2h Matches played

No H2H Matches Available

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Elena Jamshidi Marilouise Van Zyl
YTD W/L 47% (9/10) 69% (11/5)
Sets Win/Loss 44% (18/23) 61% (22/14)
Games Win/Loss 48% (171/183) 56% (181/143)
Hard Win/Loss 47% (9/10) 69% (11/5)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.02 0.06
Aces Total 3 9
DFs per game 0.36 0.24
DFs Total 62 38
Avg Match Time 1:24:37 1:17:52
Avg Opp Rank 249.89 59.06
1st Serve % 71% (721/1012) 66% (497/751)
1st Serve W% 51% (368/721) 59% (291/497)
2nd Serve W% 41% (119/291) 42% (106/254)
BPs Won% Total 50% (66/132) 52% (55/106)
Return Pts W% 48% (502/1046) 51% (374/737)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 20% (1/4) 80% (4/1)
Futures W/L 57% (8/6) 64% (7/4)
Best of 3 Sets W% 47% (9/19) 67% (10/15)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 50% (2/4) 100% (2/2)
Deciding Set W% 100% (3/3) 80% (4/5)
1st set W, W 100% (7/7) 100% (8/8)
1st set W, L 0% (7/0) 0% (8/0)
1st set L, W 17% (12/2) 38% (8/3)

Elena Jamshidi Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Ksenia Laskutova
Player
Elena Jamshidi
39% ( 37 of 96)
1st Serve %
74% ( 53 of 72)
1
Aces
0
13
Double Faults
4
76% ( 28 of 37)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 28 of 53)
46% ( 27 of 59)
2nd Serve Won
58% ( 11 of 19)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
43% ( 41 of 96)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 33 of 72)
88
Total Points Won
80
L
7-6(9) 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Elena Jamshidi
57% ( 41 of 72)
1st Serve %
70% ( 57 of 82)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
66% ( 27 of 41)
1st Serve Won
46% ( 26 of 57)
42% ( 13 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 10 of 25)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
33% ( 3 of 9)
44% ( 32 of 72)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 46 of 82)
86
Total Points Won
68
L
6-1 7-6(6) H2H
R2
cross
Elena Jamshidi
Player
Noa Liauw A Fong
78% ( 29 of 37)
1st Serve %
71% ( 39 of 55)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
72% ( 21 of 29)
1st Serve Won
49% ( 19 of 39)
75% ( 6 of 8)
2nd Serve Won
19% ( 3 of 16)
50% ( 6 of 12)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
27% ( 10 of 37)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 33 of 55)
60
Total Points Won
32
W
6-0 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Elena Jamshidi
Player
Darja Suvirdjonkova
66% ( 29 of 44)
1st Serve %
61% ( 23 of 38)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69% ( 20 of 29)
1st Serve Won
43% ( 10 of 23)
73% ( 11 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
27% ( 4 of 15)
100% ( 5 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
30% ( 13 of 44)
Rtn Points Won
63% ( 24 of 38)
55
Total Points Won
27
W
6-2 6-0 H2H
F
cross
Matilde Mariani
Player
Elena Jamshidi
71% ( 49 of 69)
1st Serve %
59% ( 26 of 44)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
59% ( 29 of 49)
1st Serve Won
42% ( 11 of 26)
45% ( 9 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
22% ( 4 of 18)
86% ( 6 of 7)
Break Points Won
43% ( 3 of 7)
45% ( 31 of 69)
Rtn Points Won
66% ( 29 of 44)
67
Total Points Won
46
L
6-2 6-3 H2H
SF
cross
Elena Jamshidi
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
86% ( 88 of 102)
1st Serve %
66% ( 75 of 114)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
13
53% ( 47 of 88)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 46 of 75)
21% ( 3 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
26% ( 10 of 39)
56% ( 9 of 16)
Break Points Won
89% ( 8 of 9)
51% ( 52 of 102)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 58 of 114)
108
Total Points Won
108
W
5-7 6-4 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Elena Jamshidi
Player
Michika Ozeki
72% ( 75 of 104)
1st Serve %
67% ( 84 of 126)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
10
57% ( 43 of 75)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 45 of 84)
38% ( 11 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 17 of 42)
47% ( 8 of 17)
Break Points Won
47% ( 8 of 17)
48% ( 50 of 104)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 64 of 126)
118
Total Points Won
112
W
7-6(4) 4-6 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Elena Jamshidi
Player
Kaitlyn Leigh Ramduth
85% ( 71 of 84)
1st Serve %
77% ( 47 of 61)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
58% ( 41 of 71)
1st Serve Won
40% ( 19 of 47)
54% ( 7 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 7 of 14)
88% ( 7 of 8)
Break Points Won
44% ( 4 of 9)
43% ( 36 of 84)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 35 of 61)
83
Total Points Won
62
W
3-6 6-2 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Elena Jamshidi
Player
Beatrice Stagno
73% ( 47 of 64)
1st Serve %
54% ( 25 of 46)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
62% ( 29 of 47)
1st Serve Won
40% ( 10 of 25)
47% ( 8 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
29% ( 6 of 21)
75% ( 6 of 8)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
42% ( 27 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
65% ( 30 of 46)
67
Total Points Won
43
W
6-2 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Vaishnavi Adkar
Player
Elena Jamshidi
73% ( 43 of 59)
1st Serve %
73% ( 48 of 66)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
58% ( 25 of 43)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 24 of 48)
69% ( 11 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 8 of 18)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
39% ( 23 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 34 of 66)
70
Total Points Won
55
L
6-3 6-4 H2H

Marilouise Van Zyl Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Marilouise Van Zyl
Player
Donna Le Roux
66% ( 67 of 102)
1st Serve %
50% ( 43 of 86)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
45% ( 30 of 67)
1st Serve Won
47% ( 20 of 43)
49% ( 17 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 16 of 43)
56% ( 10 of 18)
Break Points Won
53% ( 9 of 17)
54% ( 55 of 102)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 50 of 86)
97
Total Points Won
91
W
3-6 6-4 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Marilouise Van Zyl
Player
Smriti Bhasin
70% ( 43 of 61)
1st Serve %
67% ( 48 of 72)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
65% ( 28 of 43)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 23 of 48)
56% ( 10 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 10 of 24)
43% ( 6 of 14)
Break Points Won
33% ( 3 of 9)
38% ( 23 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 39 of 72)
77
Total Points Won
56
W
7-5 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Marilouise Van Zyl
Player
Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane
77% ( 24 of 31)
1st Serve %
38% ( 15 of 39)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
9
63% ( 15 of 24)
1st Serve Won
33% ( 5 of 15)
71% ( 5 of 7)
2nd Serve Won
17% ( 4 of 24)
70% ( 7 of 10)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
35% ( 11 of 31)
Rtn Points Won
77% ( 30 of 39)
50
Total Points Won
20
W
6-1 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Michika Ozeki
Player
Marilouise Van Zyl
72% ( 43 of 60)
1st Serve %
72% ( 46 of 64)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
56% ( 24 of 43)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 22 of 46)
47% ( 8 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
22% ( 4 of 18)
47% ( 7 of 15)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
47% ( 28 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
59% ( 38 of 64)
70
Total Points Won
54
L
6-3 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Marilouise Van Zyl
Player
Niditra Rajmohan
71% ( 5 of 7)
1st Serve %
50% ( 2 of 4)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
80% ( 4 of 5)
1st Serve Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
100% ( 2 of 2)
2nd Serve Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
100% ( 1 of 1)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
14% ( 1 of 7)
Rtn Points Won
100% ( 4 of 4)
10
Total Points Won
1
W
2-0 ret. H2H
Q1
cross
Marilouise Van Zyl
Player
Grace Koenig
70% ( 23 of 33)
1st Serve %
59% ( 20 of 34)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
91% ( 21 of 23)
1st Serve Won
35% ( 7 of 20)
40% ( 4 of 10)
2nd Serve Won
14% ( 2 of 14)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
24% ( 8 of 33)
Rtn Points Won
74% ( 25 of 34)
50
Total Points Won
17
W
6-0 6-0 H2H
R2
cross
Nagomi Higashitani
Player
Marilouise Van Zyl
75% ( 44 of 59)
1st Serve %
58% ( 32 of 55)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
61% ( 27 of 44)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 19 of 32)
47% ( 7 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
22% ( 5 of 23)
60% ( 6 of 10)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
42% ( 25 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 31 of 55)
65
Total Points Won
49
L
6-3 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Marilouise Van Zyl
Player
Erin Mckenzie
61% ( 67 of 110)
1st Serve %
69% ( 68 of 98)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
5
66% ( 44 of 67)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 35 of 68)
37% ( 16 of 43)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 13 of 30)
60% ( 6 of 10)
Break Points Won
29% ( 4 of 14)
45% ( 50 of 110)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 50 of 98)
110
Total Points Won
98
W
4-6 7-6(5) 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Anna Kubareva
Player
Marilouise Van Zyl
73% ( 37 of 51)
1st Serve %
63% ( 37 of 59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73% ( 27 of 37)
1st Serve Won
49% ( 18 of 37)
57% ( 8 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 10 of 22)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
31% ( 16 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 31 of 59)
66
Total Points Won
44
L
6-1 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Marilouise Van Zyl
Player
Unknown Player
69% ( 49 of 71)
1st Serve %
74% ( 57 of 77)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
55% ( 27 of 49)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 31 of 57)
45% ( 10 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 7 of 20)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
50% ( 5 of 10)
48% ( 34 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 39 of 77)
76
Total Points Won
72
W
7-5 3-6 10-7 H2H

Jamshidi Vs Zyl Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Jamshidi are available here and Zyl photos here.


Potential H2H Matches This Week For Marilouise Van Zyl

W35 Hillcrest

Zyl vs Pfeifer H2H Prediction , could play in The Semifinals

Zyl vs Higashitani H2H Prediction , could play in The Semifinals

Zyl vs Zyl H2H Prediction , could play in The Semifinals

Zyl vs Vanlangendonck H2H Prediction , could play in The Semifinals

Zyl vs Ozeki H2H Prediction , could play in The Quarterfinals

Zyl vs Avataneo H2H Prediction , could play in The Quarterfinals

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions